Re: [PATCH] Split out merge_recursive() to merge-recursive.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Move most of the of code from builtin-merge-recursive.c to a new file
> merge-recursive.c and introduce merge_recursive_setup() in there so that
> builtin-merge-recursive and other builtins call it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:27:01PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>  (1) move bulk of code from builtin-merge-recursive.c to a new file
>>      merge-recursive.c and introduce merge_recursive_helper() in there
>>      so
>>      that both of you and cmd_merge_recursive() itself can call it;
>
> Something like this?

Hmm, I think callers except "git merge" implementation should not be even
using the "recursive" variant, so in that sense, I do not think you would
need to expose anything but merge_trees().  But the new file is called
merge-recursive.c not merge-trees.c, and in any case, builtin-merge.c
needs to link to the recursive one, so this split is Ok.  Exposure of
make_virtual_commit() somewhat feels dirty, and I tend to agree that the
pure "three-tree merge with rename detection" (aka merge_trees()) should
operate on three trees, not commits, though.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux