Re: [PATCH (1b)] merge-recursive.c: Add more generic merge_recursive_generic()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Stephan Beyer wrote:

> merge_recursive_generic() takes, in comparison to to merge_recursive(),
> no commit ("struct commit *") arguments but SHA ids ("unsigned char *"),
> and no commit list of bases but an array of refs ("const char **").
> 
> This makes it more generic in the case that it can also take the SHA
> of a tree to merge trees without commits, for the bases, the head
> and the remote.
> 
> merge_recursive_generic() also handles locking and updating of the
> index, which is a common use case of merge_recursive().
> 
> This patch also rewrites builtin-merge-recursive.c to make use of
> merge_recursive_generic().  By doing this, I stumbled over the
> limitation of 20 bases and I've added a warning if this limitation
> is exceeded.
> 
> This patch qualifies make_virtual_commit() as static again because
> this function is not needed anymore outside merge-recursive.c.

You might look at builtin-checkout and see if merge_working_tree() could 
be made cleaner with this API, or if some other API could accomodate both 
cases more nicely.

(I'm not sure either way, but it would be a good confirmation that the API 
is properly convenient if that additional case could use it.)

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux