Jan Hudec wrote:
>On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 19:57:35 +0200, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>> Jan Hudec wrote:
>If git was to store anything for empty
>directories, it would be empty tree, not a tree containing empty blob called
>'.'. There was even a prototype patch to do that sent to the list (I believe
Ok, sounds reasonable.
With respect to the storage inside the tree, using a duplicate name with
mode 0 or a name with some kind of rare extension...
It should probably be investigated how much of the existing core needs
to be touched/changed to support the duplicate name.
I agree that using a custom rare extension would allow for almost no
change to git-core.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
Real programmers don't produce results, they return exit codes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
