Re: keeping /etc under git with etckeeper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 09, 2008 at 08:48:39PM +0200, Pierre-Julien Bringer <pj.bringer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 3 If Git has some sort of merge conflict on important config files
> (passwd, etc...), it would be pretty bad [3].
> 
> When using etckeeper:
> 1 There would be a link between the changes if a commit occurs between tasks.

I don't exactly see what the problem is here.

> 2 Permissions are stored thanks to Metastore.

Actually it no longer uses metastore, but yes, etckeeper handles
permissions properly, so it is not a problem. The second problem is
point 3) from your previous list, but that's easy to avoid: never ever
merge, rebase (or any other task that can result in a conflict) in your
/etc.

In short, if you want to just track your directory, then it's OK, but if
you want to use git to handle the config of multiple machines, it'll be
too problematic, I would not suggest doing so.

Attachment: pgp3Z12s74buI.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux