Re: StGit: kha/{stable,safe,experimental} updated

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-08-05 22:33:57 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> 2008/8/1 Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Heh. It's _always_ your main worry. But rightly so, since mistakes
> > could be costly. Thanks for spending time on this with me.
>
> I'm usually worried about performance but will give it a try with a
> Linux kernel and real patches. Have you done any tests to compare it
> with my master branch?

Yes. I posted the benchmark results a while back -- as I recall, the
performance was about the same for large uncommit and rebase
operations.

Also, I'm currently investigating some possible optimizations. Will
post new bechmarks afterwards, if I get something working.

> Would we even need to prune the stack history? It might get pretty
> large after about 1-2 years of usage.

Yes, it's growing without bound, so eventually one would have to prune
it.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux