On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 03:57:33PM +0200, H.Merijn Brand wrote: > We already changed the approach for converting projects from SCCS to > create a recursive repo from all SCCS repo's. And that *is* perfect. Yes, but that's orthogonal to whether to separate the imported history from the pure history? (Not that I'd want to force it upon you. If you have a lot of nested repositories, the grafting can get a bit obnoxious if you don't automate it well, I suppose.) > Problem with the current join/merge is that there already have been > commits to the git repo after the SCCS convert that I do not want to > loose. You could rebase these to the new initial commit. But if you already use Git intensively and rewriting history would create big headache for you at this point already, it's too late, I guess. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
