On zo, 2008-08-03 at 19:09 -0700, Eric Wong wrote: > Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke-list@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I could imagine that leaving git-svn alone and adding a hook to git-log > > would be more useful, though. > > NACK on modifying git-svn to support more changelog formats. > > A better idea would be to write a generic script that takes "git log", > "git svn log" or even plain "svn log" output and filters it > independently. > This filter should be reusable for both plain svn and git-svn: > The possibilities are endless :) Yes, but we'll most probably drop SVN rsn, possibly after a short period of supporting both; and not stripping the cruft in the conversion means we carry this with us until eternity. Besides, who is going to distribute the script, inform users about its availability? What we have now suffices for our ooo-build conversion. If you do not find it useful, more power/less code to you. Let others search the archives and/or patch git-svn themselves, if indeed there are any. Jan. -- Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@xxxxxxx> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://www.lilypond.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
