Re: [PATCH] Set up argv0_path correctly, even when argv[0] is just the basename

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jan Hudec <bulb@xxxxxx> writes:

> On UNIX, not only that argv[0] can contain the program without path -- it can
> contain anything the user thinks of.... Maybe since
> it's only needed for resolving a relative exec dir, relative exec dir could
> be supported only on systems that have such method (which is most of them).

The "relocatable install" itself is not usually a common concept in the
UNIX world, and I do not think this matters anyway.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux