On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Kevin Ballard <kevin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > As a Ruby user, the regex for the funcname looks fine to me. What is your opinion about the anonymous code blocks? I've been thinking that another possibility could be to have two ruby funcnames, a simpler one (the one I presented) that only has 'named' blocks, and a more thorough one that also matches up anonymous blocks. User could then choose which one to use in their code by having gitattributes such as *.rb diff=ruby or *.rb diff=ruby-full (or whatever else). I'm not sure this would be a sensible policy though. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
