On 8/1/08, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 03:45:15PM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:
> > + { "pas", "\\(^\\(procedure\\|function\\|constructor\\|"
> > + "destructor\\|interface\\|implementation\\|"
> > + "type|initialization|finalization\\).*$\\)"
> > + "\\|\\(^.*=[ \t]*\\(class\\|record\\).*$\\)" },
>
> Wouldn't it be better to make the second pattern start on new line
> instead of the outer \(\|\)?
I didn't even know that was possible, but suddenly I understand the
"java" pattern a lot better. Thanks!
> Why "type"?
Well, it's a subsection, but it's always followed by a class or record
definition anyway, so I guess it makes more sense to omit it, now that
you bring it up.
Have fun,
Avery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
