Hi, On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Luciano Rocha wrote: > On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 01:56:37PM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote: > > > > > * handling of svn:externals using submodules > > > > The main concern I have is to get the semantics right: AFAICT > > svn:externals has _no notion_ of "what is current". It just _always_ > > fetches the HEAD. Even if you check out an ancient revision in the > > "superproject". > > Usually, yes. But you could specify a specific revision with -r <rev>. I do not see how that helps defining the semantics for git-svn at all. > With the new 1.5, it is also possible to specify pegged revisions. Much > better, because otherwise subversion would require that the path existed > in the server in HEAD. As I already commented, the possibility (and for most svn repositories, the likelihood) that nothing is pegged makes this less helpful, either. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
