Re: git merge --squash isn't "marked as a merge"??

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists)"  <4ux6as402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Newbie alert:
>
> I have a feature branch where I have N tiny commits with sloppy/private
> commit messages....

Probably you would want to step back and _think_ why you want to squash in
the first place.  I suspect the answer would lead to a better use of the
available set of tools, such as "use 'rebase -i' to clean up the original
history and then 'merge' (without squash) it or 'rebase' it".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux