Re: Bizarre missing changes (git bug?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:59:01AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:

> Right now you're giving me the choice between a crappy incomplete history 
> or a crappy history full of useless information. That's it? As long as 
> your challenge involves being compared to crappy history, I'm not 
> interested. If the solution should involve a switch "--correct-history" 
> or I have to wait for the result, I don't care, because it's the correct 
> history I want. As long as you're trying to sell me crappy history I'm not 
> buying it.
> 
> Can we please get past this and look at what is required to produce the 
> correct history?

You seem to be indicating here (and elsewhere in the thread) that there
exists some history graph for which neither "git log" nor "git log
--full-history" produces the output you want, but that there is some
better output (even if it might take more time to compute).

Perhaps I am just slow, but I haven't been able to figure out what that
history is, or what the "correct" output should be. Can you try to state
more clearly what it is you are looking for?

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux