Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 02:09:18AM +0200, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:

> > If the result should become the state of 'x', too, I would then just
> > 'git push origin y:x'.
> 
> But this means that everybody doing a 'git pull' on that repo will get
> complaints when pulling, right? Should they just send out a message to
> all their users that they'll need to rebase all their changes now?
> (Not being sarcastic, am trying to work out what the recommended
> workflow is here.)

I think you are missing the fact that he is doing this push _after_
having merged the history into master via "-s ours". So it is a
fast-forward to push at that point.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux