Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 23:35, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> The quoted sentence by me in that message was after I explained why "per
>> hunk theirs" aka "-Xtheirs" was not such a great idea I further went on to
>> say "by the way, '-s theirs' is even worse and here is why".

Aaah, ok, now I see where my confusion came from. Thank you for
clarifying that. Then remains the question, what to tell those that
want '-s theirs' not to keep track of their changes, but to keep a
fast-forwardable master?

> Heh, I ended up doing the "digging" myself.   The quote came from this:
>
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89010/focus=89024
>
> and "tried not to sound too negative" there refers to:
>
>    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89010/focus=89021
>
> which _was_ about the "-Xtheirs", not "-s theirs".

Understood, it makes sense now.

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux