Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 04:54:17PM +0200, Sverre Rabbelier <alturin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, in short: what does the list think about adding
> "git-merge-theirs", that does (although possibly less 'hackish'):
> 
> cat > git-merge-theirs << EOF
> #!/bin/sh
> eval git read-tree --reset -u \\\$\$#
> EOF

Isn't this the stupid one?

It's perfect for my testing needs, but this is not something that people
should ever use on a real repo.

Attachment: pgp536pDbXsKl.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux