2008/7/28 Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>: > Yes. Hooks, just as the config and reflogs, are supposed to be local > things. Rationale being: it is rude, and also insecure, to install > something that potentially calls other programs without the user saying > so. Oh absolutely, I agree with that. > All you can do is checking in a copy of the hook, and ask your users/check > in your build system that it is installed. Hmm -- perhaps I am being unintentionally dense, but I am assuming that when you say "checking in a copy" you mean anywhere other than .git/hooks/ since that isn't tracked by git. I have no problem with the rationale you've just described -- but it would be handy to add this post-merge hook script into hooks/ (exec bit removed) such that on a clone, all one would need to do is chmod +x it. If that's possible, I'm clearly missing the steps to enable this. Thanks, -- Thomas Adam -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
