Hi, On Mon, 28 Jul 2008, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:14 AM, Roman Zippel <zippel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Why are you dismissing what I wrote without even giving it a second > > thought? I didn't bother with the initial example, because it's so > > simple, that it's no real challenge. > > I can't speak for anyone else, but you do have to keep in mind that a > solution to this has to be rather fast - and I mean fast in git terms, > not in scripting-language-fast terms. You also have to keep in mind, that I haven't really hacked git before, so I'm just trying to do something with the data I can somehow extract from it. I seriously didn't thought that anyone wouldn't understand that the code example was just a proof of concept. > That you can do it Ruby - and I may be able to do it Perl - has little > bearing on what can be done inside the git log machinery with a small > performance penalty. It also has to do with correctness, is performance more important than correctness? Part of the problem is, what is the correct history, as which it should be displayed via the various interfaces by default. bye, Roman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
