As a contributer with a single commit I was happy to see myself appear
shortly on the list (yeah!). Ok, so I realize it is vanity and a little
silly... :-)
Junio C Hamano gitster-at-pobox.com |Lists| wrote:
I have a mild suspicion that sorting that list in alphabetical order may
actually make it much better. It all depends on the purpose of that list,
though.
To me it makes sense to sort the entire list according to commits. Its
still easy to find anybody with search, and I find it appropriate that I
be towards the end. The commit sorting encourages me to move up the
list! :-D
And for the "giving credit" purpose, I do not think truncating the list at
5 commits or less threshold, as suggested earlier and already done, makes
much sense, either.
And why truncate the list? I'd personally like to be back on the list
(vanity! - but true), bandwidth is relatively cheap, and there is
nothing below the list. I also think it makes the community look healty
and encourages contribution to see how many others contribute.
Peter
--
Peter Valdemar Mørch
http://www.morch.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
