On Sat, 26 Jul 2008, Petr Baudis wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 07:28:32PM -0700, Scott Chacon wrote:
I am more concerned about the logo at the bottom, and Petr and I are
discussing this - I can remove the logo, but then I'd have to pay for
this out of my pocket instead of having a small logo on the page.
I actually think that this is *one* reference to GitHub that is
perfectly and 100% okay; if it is sponsoring the hosting, it deserves
the logo, and it is fairly non-intrusive. I _am_ watching out warily
for excessive GitHub references within the rest of the site - if only
because I have kind of personal interest in a competitor of GitHub and
thus don't want GitHub to get unwarranted free advertising. :-)
Petr "Pasky" Baudis
since this is a Ruby on Rails site, could the 'five links' that have been
bothering people be randomly selected? if every time you go to the site
you get a different list of projects it show how broadly git is used. it's
not as 'in your face' as managing to select five that cause people to say
"wow, they're using this", but different people will react to different
sites.
if this table gets populated by GitHub, kernel.org, and a couple other
sources it should be vendor independant enough (and we need a table like
this anyway for the 'list of projects that use git', so it serves two
purposes)
David Lang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
