Hi, On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 04:25:16AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Scott Chacon wrote: > > > A followup on the post I did a few days ago about Git documentation. > > I forked Petr's git.or.cz site and put up a version that I think is a > > bit more accessible and newbie-friendly at git-scm.com. > > I do not like the implication that Git eats trees. yes, I keep wondering about the logo as well. On one side it is rather amusing, on the other side... somehow it didn't win my heart over and it *does* look somewhat unprofessional. > I also do not like that the link to "Documentation" looks more like a > too-short cheat-sheet. I personally don't find the idea of having direct links to the most used commands bad, though I'm not sure how useful will it be in practice. > But then, I think that git.or.cz looks more professional (read: more > respectful, less geekish), so I think there is not much harm in that. Note that I tried to fix up a lot of bits that I felt were a little too colloquial in my patch series I linked in a previous mail. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name. -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
