Marek Zawirski <marek.zawirski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Jean-François Veillette wrote: >>> Maybe some users (or developers) from mailing list can tell us about >>> their opinion? >> >> I think keeping comptability for one version behind the 'current' >> (still compatible 3.3 while 3.4 is the current) is a reasonable goal. >> 3.2 is relatively far behind, tools vendor had time to get up to date >> by now. > > Robin, Shawn, would you accept next patches using 3.3 API? Yes, we should be dropping support for 3.2 now and supporting only 3.3 and 3.4 going forward. 3.2 is ancient and anyone who is serious aboug using Git with Eclipse really should be on a more current version of the tools. Same argument that Junio gave about not supporting Debian users who are still installing git 1.4.4.4 and hope it works; we suggest they install the 1.5.x based backport as soon as possible. Commercial Eclipse distributions that are still based upon 3.2 should be upgrading themselves to 3.3 real soon, and if not, their users should be forching them to do it. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
