On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 05:06:41PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > But again, I haven ever felt the lack of this feature; such usage for me > > always goes in scripts, where I am more than happy to write out "add . > > && add -u && commit". > > The reason we did not have such "feature" so far was not because somebody > high in the git foodchain was opposed to the idea, but simply because > nobody came up with a usable patch to do so. > > I do not have anything fundamentally against "add -A" nor "commit -A". To > me, this is in "perhaps nice to have for some people, but I would not use > it myself and I wouldn't bother" category, not in "I'm opposed -- it would > promote bad workflow" cateogry. I think I didn't make my point well; I am also not that I am opposed to this feature. The paragraph you quoted meant to say "What I described above with commit -A is what I think people who are asking for this feature want. But _I_ don't actually want it, even as somebody who does this workflow, so I might be wrong." -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
