On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 10:39 PM, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:11:02PM -0400, David Baldwin wrote: >> http://baldwindev.com/git.or.cz/ > I'm not sure if this is really an improvement on the current state, > but then again, the current state pretty much matches my idea and maybe > others will agree that your proposal is better. Thus, it's better to > show this to the Git community at large. :-) FWIW, I like it. I like both the better font and whitespace layout and the 3-color-spot-merge-to-white. As Petr says, we have had the (apologies, but to me) ugly logo for a while, so it is widely used, and perhaps it has even grown on people. BazaarNG managed to grab the best concept logo of the lot, IMHO, with the 'merge' roadsign. > If you think you have a cooler logo, that's fine too, but then it's > again better to present it explicitly, I believe. Can we separate the 2 things? The better fonts and layout look like a win to me. WRT the logo, the current one is not a particularly strong image, and we haven't spent millions in plastering it over magazines or anything. So a good new logo would be something to take on. cheers, m -- martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
