Re: [RFC] Stopping those fat "What's cooking in git.git" threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 02:05:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> But I think it is a good idea to change the subject when responding to one
> part of the message to say which topic your response is about.

It was me as well, who did not change the subject; I'll try to pay
attention to do so.

> I do not know if stripping "In-reply-to" is a great idea, though.  They
> are responses, aren't they?

Personally I'm fine with mutt's "break thread" feature, I just proposed
it because I saw it was mentioned multiple times that gmane does not
handle huge threads nicely. But yes, you have reason about keeping the
header makes sense as well.

Attachment: pgpgIlHpw9axz.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux