Re: Suggestion: doc restructuring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> So what I really would like is this: leave the plumbing pages as they are, 
> but enhance those pages that users (especially new ones) are likely to see 
> most often.

Regarding the original "do we want to ever teach plumbing to new users?"
issue, I suspect that, with sufficient enhancement to Porcelain, we might
be able to reach a point where end users can work without ever touching a
single plumbing command at all.

	Side note, that was why I suggested us to first think about use
	cases in our every day work that we still need to resort to the
	plumbing, so that we can identify what that enhancement would
	consist of.

When we reach that point, we might want to restructure the documentation
into two volumes.  One volume for end-users who exclusively use the stock
git Porcelain, and another that describes plumbing commands for Porcelain
writers.

Perhaps move the plumbing documentation to section 3; just like Perl has
DBI.3pm and friends there, /usr/share/man/man3/git-cat-file.3git will
describe what scripts can do with the command.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux