Re: Considering teaching plumbing to users harmful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:51:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Am I the only one who deems teaching plumbing to users ("I like it raw!  
> > So I teach it the same way!") harmful?
> 
> I think that justification is harmful.
> 
> More productive way to think about it is to identify cases where we _need_
> to go down to combination of the plumbing commands in our daily workflow,
> with today's command set.  That would give us a good indication that some
> Porcelain may need to be enhanced.

Is there a way to commit the contents of a tarball without using
plumbing?  I occasionally want to track an upstream that I know only as
a series of tarballs, so I do something like:

	cd repo/
	git checkout upstream
	rm -rf *
	tar -xzvf ../new-version.tar.gz

Then I spend some time mucking around with git-add and git-rm and
eventually end up having to do some sort of git ls-files | git
update-index pipeline.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux