Re: [PATCH/rfc] git-svn.perl: workaround assertions in svn library 1.5.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:28:50PM +0000, Gerrit Pape wrote:
> With subversion 1.5.0 (C and perl libraries) the git-svn selftest
> t9101-git-svn-props.sh fails at test 25 and 26.  The following commands

> The breakage was reported by Lucas Nussbaum through
>  http://bugs.debian.org/489108

> ---
>  git-svn.perl |    2 ++
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> I ran into this on Debian/unstable.  With svn 1.5.0 the selftest fails
> without the patch, with svn 1.4.6 it succeeds with and without the
> patch.  I'm not familar with the svn interfaces, not sure whether this
> is a regression in subversion, or a bug in git-svn.

Hi, while this commit fixed the selftests, it unfortunately is a
regression

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/87822/
 http://bugs.debian.org/490400

I'm still not sure whether this is a git-svn problem, or actually a
problem in subversion 1.5.0

 $ perl -MSVN::Client -e \
 'sub print_names { print "<$_[0]>\n"; } $ctx=new SVN::Client;
 $ctx->status(".", "BASE", \&print_names, 1, 1, 0, 1);' | head -5
 perl:
 /build/buildd/subversion-1.5.0dfsg1/subversion/libsvn_subr/path.c:119: svn_path_join: Assertion `is_canonical(base, blen)' failed.
 $ 
 [0]

Regards, Gerrit.

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/359679
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux