Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: >> I would however agree that when we do mean 255 we should probably write >> 255, not (-1). It is easier to document things that way. > > I started to fix the callsites that Stephan mentioned, but it really is > convenient to be able to 'return error("foo")' (or even return > func_that_calls_error(), and tracking down deep calls is time consuming > and error prone). So maybe we should just enhance the change from > 2488df84 and special case "-1" into "1"? Didn't the patch to testsuite that triggered this thread talk about "small negative integer" not "-1"? I suspect there might be other negative return values from cmd_foo(), although I haven't checked. Is it that somebody do not want 255 exit value, or anything that has 7th bit set? 2488df8 (builtin run_command: do not exit with -1., 2007-11-13) suggests otherwise at least for Windows runtime, so what we currently have that does extra truncation ourselves might be sufficient. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html