Hi, On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 03:15:42AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > > > Since the files generated and used during a rebase are never to be > > > tracked, they should live in $GIT_DIR. While at it, avoid the rather > > > meaningless term "dotest" to "rebase", and unhide ".dotest-merge". > > > > I understand moving away from .dotest/ to .git/something, but I do not > > follow the logic of making that something to rebase at all. It is a > > scratch area for "am" (and applymbox), isn't it? > > Of course, you can name it as you want. But I thought that the name > "rebase" applies as well: the patches are rebased from somewhere else on > top of HEAD :-) even not considering the sequencer work, wouldn't "sequence" be a well descriptive name? Petr "Pasky" Baudis -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
