Re: [PATCH 3/4] index-pack: Track the object_entry that creates each base_data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
> > 
> > > If we free the data stored within a base_data we need the struct
> > > object_entry to get the data back again for use with another
> > > dependent delta.  Storing the object_entry* makes it simple to call
> > > get_data_from_pack() to recover the compressed information.
> > > 
> > > This however means we must add the missing baes object to the end
> > 
> > Typo?
> 
> Yea, Dscho also pointed it out.
> 
> Junio, if you can, please fix this typo in the commit message.
> 
> Its not really a big deal.  I have no plans on posting a replacement
> patch just for this one small typo.

No, it is not a big deal.  I do write crappy english myself.  I 
initially had some comments on the patch itself which whould have 
warranted another patch and then changed my mind.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux