Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jul 2008, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
>
> But this patch is suboptimal as it actually recreate the same memory
> pressure, to a lesser degree, this series is meant to solve. If you do:
Arrgh. Good catch on review. I'll post a replacement patch shortly
that doesn't suffer from this problem. Thanks!
> > + struct object_entry *obj = c->obj;
> > + void *raw = get_data_from_pack(obj);
> > + if (obj->type == OBJ_REF_DELTA || obj->type == OBJ_OFS_DELTA) {
> > + c->data = patch_delta(
> > + get_base_data(c->base), c->base->size,
> > + raw, obj->size,
> > + &c->size);
> > + free(raw);
--
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
