Quoting Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>:
Pavel Roskin <proski@xxxxxxx> writes:
Don't assume that unsupported versions are too old, they may be too new.
Excuse me, but we never assumed such.
Neither too old nor too new ones are proven to work with us yet, so we
cannot be call them supported.
The message was "skipping cvsimport tests, cvsps too old" so the
assumption was there.
Let's apply your patch and see how well version 2.2 fares.
Thanks.
diff --git a/t/t9600-cvsimport.sh b/t/t9600-cvsimport.sh
index 655f882..f92b47a 100755
--- a/t/t9600-cvsimport.sh
+++ b/t/t9600-cvsimport.sh
@@ -20,13 +20,15 @@ cvsps_version=`cvsps -h 2>&1 | sed -ne 's/cvsps
version //p'`
case "$cvsps_version" in
2.1)
;;
+2.2*)
+ ;;
Hmm, I would have written:
case "$..." in
2.1 | 2.2 )
Fine with me, but please allow for extra specifiers.
Is the reason why you have the asterisk there because the beta one claims
"2.2beta" or something (I am not suggesting to tighten the match, just
asking for information)?
It's cvsps 2.2b1 from Fedora Development (cvsps-2.2-0.1.b1.fc10.x86_64)
$ cvsps -h 2>&1 | grep version
cvsps version 2.2b1
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html