On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > IMO following the file renames/code moves precisely is really worth the > time it takes to calculate. Otherwise, the statistics will not reflect > what was going on in the project, right? Ah, I did not mean to imply that it is not worth the time it takes to calculate, more that I do not know how to implement it that way. Of course if someone has the time/motivation to do so I would very much make use of it, but I do not have time to do so myself (at least not until after GSoC). I can have GitStats just ignore the subtree merge cases (and say that it is not beyond the scope of my project to take such into account) and have a working program by the end of GSoC. But if I spend time on getting this to work instead I might end up with a program that does follow sub-tree merges but is only half-done, and as such probably won't receive a "OK" grade. So, yes, I would very much like to see this, but no time to look into doing so myself until after GSoC. -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
