Re: [PATCH 0/4] Honor core.deltaBaseCacheLimit during index-pack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008, Andreas Ericsson wrote:

> Sorry for being clueless here, but why does the older versions need
> to be kept in-memory anyway? Aren't we applying the delta each time
> we find one, repeatedly creating a new base-object in-memory for
> each delta? If we aren't doing that, why do we need more than just
> a small amount of memory just for keeping the delta?

Think of a delta chain of 49 delta objects, 1 base object.  Now 
reconstruct all of the objects.

If you do it one by one, not storing the intermediate results, you end up 
applying 1 delta for the first, 2 for the second (first the first, then 
the second), and so on, in total 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + 49 = 49 * 50 / 2 = 1225 
times.

Compare that to the 49 times when reusing the intermediate results.

Ciao,
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux