On 2008-07-12 11:24:24 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> 2008/7/2 Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > Instead of making a new temp index every time we need one, just
> > keep reusing the same one. And keep track of which tree is
> > currently stored in it -- if we do several consecutive successful
> > pushes, it's always going to be the "right" tree so that we don't
> > have to call read-tree before each patch application.
> >
> > The motivation behind this change is of course that it makes
> > things faster.
> >
> > (The same simple test as in the previous patch -- pushing 250
> > patches in a 32k-file repository, with one file-level merge
> > necessary per push -- went from 0.36 to 0.19 seconds per patch
> > with this patch applied.)
>
> That's an impressive improvement (together with the previous patch).
> Is this with the new patch log infrastructure?
Yes, with all the bells and whistles -- in particular, with the
overhead of the simplified log. (But note that it's a synthetic
benchmark, and not a real linux-kernel patch series.)
--
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.treskal.com/kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
