Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Your patch looks good. But there is also the problem that new bisect logs > will not be understood by old git. So I wonder if a patch to only read the > new log should be first commited to the "maint" branch. I do not think it is worth it. If we are making something long lived like rerere cache backward incompatible, the approach would be sensible, but bisect log is about a single session and once you reached the breakage you would not reuse it. Besides, the bisect log is designed to be executable shell script so you can always copy it out, edit it if needed and feed that to shell. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
