At Friday 11 July 2008 16:36:07 Johannes Schindelin wrote : > The question is not so much if it would work, but what people would do > with this. They would probably include something in a mail to you like > "v2.6.26-rc9-111 stopped working!", you would test "v2.6.26-rc9-111" and > go back "but it still works!". > > Because you are talking about two different things. > > So, in what workflow would v2.6.26-rc9-111 actually be helpful? For > yourself working in your own lil' branch? I do not think so. HEAD~23 is > much more helpful in that case, since locally, you do not work so much > relative to a given tag, but relative to your current HEAD. > > Hth, > Dscho Ah yes, this clarified it for me. -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print: 7B1A 07F4 EC82 0F90 D4C2 8936 872A E508 7DB6 9DA3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
