Re: [PATCH] builtin-rerere: fix conflict markers parsing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Olivier Marin wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin a écrit :
> > 
> > Okay, but then the obvious question is: what do you do about "<<<<<<" 
> > lines that are not a marker?
> 
> The answer is the same.

I think not.  You say you want to do something about the ambiguity, but 
fact is: the conflict markers are ambiguous.  They always have been, will 
ever be, and I do not even have to argue for it.  Or do I?

> > Same remark as before: if you fix rerere, why not do it properly?
> 
> If you have a better fix send a patch or at least give me some clues.

Did I not say that the index has enough information?  Or at least hint at 
it?

Of course, we could run with your solution.  But that only fixes a corner 
case, right?

So a proper fix will be needed eventually anyway.

And no, I will not work on it: this is not my itch, and my time is being 
stolen too much already, these days.

Ciao,
Dscho

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux