Re: About -X<option>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Isn't that obvious?  -X looks like a short option, but the rest of that 
> string does not consist of aggregated short options.

Ah, I see.  Then the issue is not about "not easy to code" but about "not
being consistent".  We should care much more deeply about the latter.

We can change it to "--X<option>[=<value>]" and "-X option[=<value>]"; the
topic is still young, not even documented properly IIRC, and is not
scheduled for 'master' any time soon yet.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux