Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Stephan Beyer, Tue, Jul 01, 2008 04:38:30 +0200: >> Hi, >> >> here is the patchset for the git-sequencer prototype, documentation, >> test suite and a first git-am and git-rebase-i migration. >> Indeed, monster patches. ;) > > BTW, how about renaming it in something short: git seq. There is > already a seq(1) in GNU coreutils, which does roughly the same (prints > a sequence of numbers), why not reuse the name? Is it advantageous to use shorter but less descriptive name for this command? It will be a backend to am/rebase and not something the users will type from the command line, won't it? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
