Re: update-index --assume-unchanged doesn't make things go fast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> By the way, from time to time there on this mailing list is idea
> to add entries for directories in the index.  This could help situation
> like yours, tracking emty directories, faster operations when some trees
> are unchanged, subtree <-> subproject changes.

Tracking empty directories might be helped by having an explicit entry in
the index (even though it may not be the only possible implementation).  I
however suspect you are overvaluing it for "some trees are unchanged"
case:

        $ mkdir -p a/b
        $ stat a | grep Modify
        Modify: 2008-06-27 11:38:13.000000000 -0700
        $ >a/b/c
        $ stat a | grep Modify
        Modify: 2008-06-27 11:38:13.000000000 -0700
        $ >a/d
        $ stat a | grep Modify
        Modify: 2008-06-27 11:38:32.000000000 -0700

You have to descend into the leaf level anyway and directory mtime does
not allow you to check that much.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux