On 2008.06.27 09:54:43 -0700, Robert Anderson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:10 AM, Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Hm, I use "stash" for that purpose, which leads to kind of the reverse > > of your approach. So I do sth. like this: > > - hack hack hack > > - Notice that I want to make two commits out of what I have in my > > working tree > > - git add -p -- stage what I want in the first commit > > - git commit -m tmp -- temporary commit > > This is a guess at the first commit? I don't like it, but I'm still > listening. It's rather a work-around to stash away only the changes that are not in the index. See the other reply to my mail for a patch that adds an option to stash to do that without the commit/reset hack. > > - git stash -- stash away what doesn't belong in the first commit > > - git reset HEAD^ -- drop the temporary commit, with the changes kept > > in the working tree > > Now I have my guess at the first commit as my tree state, correct? > What happens when I decide I need a couple of hunks from another file > which I missed in my first guess, and is now in the stashed state? > How do I get those out of the stash and into the working tree? If > there is no convenient way to do that, then this method is not > sufficient to cover the use case I am talking about. git stash pop eventually fix conflicts if you changed the working tree in the meantime go back to the "git add -p" step Björn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html