Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > But I wonder if this patch is even worth it at some later point > > in time. Are we also going to change git-daemon to stop accepting > > "git-" form? Is it a worthwhile change? > > This was merely responding to... > > From: "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep some git-* programs in $(bindir) > Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:37:41 -0400 > Message-ID: <20080625043741.GD11793@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > ... > > Should they use "git upload-pack" [...] > > IMHO they should in the future use "git upload-pack". Sorry I wasn't clear. I was talking about the SSH transport only. For git:// we could just always send git-upload-pack, like your transitional patch does. Then we stay compatible with even very old git:// servers. -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
