Re: update-index --assume-unchanged doesn't make things go fast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 25 Jun 2008, Avery Pennarun wrote:
> On 6/25/08, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Which git version do you use? Does it have the following configuration
> > variable (also available as command option):
> >
> >   status.showUntrackedFiles::
> > [...]
> 
> Thanks, I didn't know about that one.  Using that definitely makes
> "git status" go much faster (pretty much instantaneous if I've also
> used --assume-unchanged on everything).
> 
> Now the catch is, if I want to implement the daemon I was talking
> about earlier, I'd like to be able to notice untracked files (or
> directories with untracked files) individually.  Ideally, I guess the
> best way would be to just keep a separate list of all existing files
> that aren't in the index, and have git status look at that rather than
> at the actual filesystem.
> 
> Are there any suggestions for how best to do this?

You can try to take a look at how (third-party and Linux only) inotify
extension for Mercurial works.  AFAIK IIRC it uses some kind of daemon
which watches for inotify notices and updates Mercorial's equivalent
of index.

-- 
Jakub Narebski
Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux