Re: [Bug] for-each-ref: %(object) and %(type) unimplemented

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/6/25 Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 12:08:15PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
>
>> Since you seem to be testing for-each-ref, maybe it would make sense to
>> put together a test script that exercises each of the atoms?
>
> Hmm. Actually, there is a test in t6300 that runs with each atom name.
> Unfortunately, it doesn't bother actually checking the output for
> sanity, so the fact that these atoms returned the empty string was
> missed.

The documentation also says "tree" and "parent" should work (which they
also don't).

-- 
Mikael Magnusson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux