Re: update-index --assume-unchanged doesn't make things go fast

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Avery Pennarun venit, vidit, dixit 25.06.2008 18:44:
...
4) My idea is to eventually --assume-unchanged my whole repository,
then write a cheesy daemon that uses the Win32 dnotify-equivalent to
watch for files that get updated and then selectively
--no-assume-unchanged files that it gets notified about.  That would
avoid the need to ever synchronously scan the whole repo for changes,
thus making my git-Win32 experience much faster and more enjoyable.
(This daemon ought to be possible to run on Linux as well, for similar
improvements on gigantic repositories.  Also note that TortoiseSVN for
Windows does something similar to track file status updates, so this
isn't *just* me being crazy.)

Looks like users on slow NFS would profit, too. Hate to say it, but hg feels faster on (slow) NFS than git. Yet I use git, for other reasons ;)

Michael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux