On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 07:09:03PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > We used to mark hooks we ship as samples by making them unexecutable, but > some filesystems cannot tell what is executable and what is not. > > This makes it much more explicit. The hooks are suffixed with .sample > (but now are made executable), so enabling it is still one step operation > (instead of "chmod +x $hook", you would do "mv $hook.sample $hook") but > now they won't get accidentally enabled on systems without executable bit. > Wouldn't it be better to name the hooks $hook.deactivated so its obvious to anybody that they are not executed? Just my 2 cents. -Peter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
