I'll queue the patch to 'master' and I suspect that this will make 31d6632
(Windows: Change the name of hook scripts to make them not executable.,
2007-11-30) unnecessary.
I've looked at diff between ee1e0a3 (the original "pull" request) and
8fd39ba (after WS fixup on borrowed code and other changes).
They all looked fine except for git.c::main() where do .. while does not
have a { } around the body (which is not required by C language but it
just looked funny).
I am very tempted to pull MinGW series directly to 'master', or at least
to 'next', perhaps after dropping 31d6632. What's your confidence level
on the series? I think we should give this series extra priority so that
any potential issues with other series (like dr/ceil) that do pathname
traversal will become more apparent sooner rather than later.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
