Re: apply --recount, was Re: [PATCH v4] git-add--interactive: manual hunk editing mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:16:08PM +0100, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

> I think it was not a flaw, but something to be worried about: 
> 
> http://mid.gmane.org/7v4p87zcv6.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To spare you following that link: Junio wanted to reuse "git apply 
> --recount" to apply mboxes, where a separator "^-- $" to the signature is 
> quite common, and could be mistaken for a "-" line of a hunk.

Ah, OK. Thanks for the recap, that makes sense to me now.

> However, I think that this issue should not concern us _now_.  As long as 
> --recount is only to be used in "add -i" and "add -e", I think the patch 
> is good as is:

I agree. We can worry about the other when and if somebody decides to
use it that way (but maybe Junio is already planning to do so...).

Thomas, do you want to just re-submit the "--recount" patches when you
re-submit your patch?

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux